Remix.run Logo
gruez an hour ago

>Contributors

>...

>claude

You don't need to presume. If someone is so lazy that they tell claude to commit their code (ie. they're too lazy to run git commit themselves), the chances they reviewed the code is slim.

danirod 40 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

To be fair, I appreciate when they are so upfront about who wrote the code without requiring further heuristics, so I encourage this behavior.

bensyverson 20 minutes ago | parent [-]

Yes, I do this all the time, and also check in the co-authored project plans which drove the commits. For a project that is transparently only possible due to agentic coding, I don't see any reason to conceal the methods.

simonw 37 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Honestly, Claude writes better commit messages than most people.

Personally I've mostly given in to letting it commit for me now, though I do occasionally take over and hand-write the messages if it's a particularly important concept and Claude's is too verbose.

Codex/GPT-x defaults to one-line commit messages, which are too short. Claude likes to write several paragraphs, which is usually too long.

If you tell it how to commit properly once per session it will stick with your standards for the rest of that session, and you can put that in AGENTS.md if you can be bothered to.

k8sToGo 41 minutes ago | parent | prev [-]

Why do you say lazy? maybe they are ok with people seeing it is claude?