No. In fact the opposite.

I’m happy that people are willing to question things in the face of unbridled optimism. Your comment dismissing the people working on actually figuring out what the models are doing as “not-doers” included.

Some are picturing themselves as intelligent for their quick adoption and rushing ahead, others are picturing them as toddlers running into the street before looking both ways.

▲

zuzululu 2 hours ago | parent [-]

Again, another very condescending and arrogant take painting others who see economic benefit from AI use.

Explain to me how working 3 remote jobs as a result of AI is "rushing ahead".

Also reading through your comments, you seem to repeatedly use frightening analogies to make your points, instead of really offering any depth to your opinions with relevant examples not involving children and toddlers. Your own profile describes yourself as "Cybersecurity - Babysitter for devs" for one. I find this unsettling.

	▲	ofjcihen 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		I’m glad you have the context of my profession as a security professional. Part of my client base is very interested in those working multiple jobs and breaching contracts. So help me reconcile this: >Explain to me how working 3 remote jobs as a result of AI is "rushing ahead". Do you honestly think that splitting your work between 3 companies allows you to provide secure and quality code to each of them? I can tell you that multiple people have used their over employment as an excuse as to why they deployed highly insecure applications leading to breaches that I’m called in for. Of course only after we press them about it.