| ▲ | 0cf8612b2e1e 4 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||
Somewhat relatedly, how do the economics for Huggingface work? They must be hosting petabytes of models and datasets by now. I have downloaded quite a few “just in case”, only to replace them with the later iteration months later. Does the file hosting actually cost peanuts when you do it yourself and the cloud has shattered my understanding of what it actually costs to deliver so much data? | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | wongarsu 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
File hosting is pretty cheap. Egress traffic is about $90/TB in the cloud, but around $1/TB in the real world. Storage is in the realm of $5/TB/month after adding redundancy At the scale of Huggingface, that still amounts to a lot load of money. Significantly less than if you did the same in AWS, but still a lot That said, they do have a deal with AWS to make the data available in AWS ip space. Maybe they got some cheap hosting out of that too | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | lima 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
Bandwidth is really cheap when you run your own infra | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | jvuygbbkuurx 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
Maybe download numbers are relatively low | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||