I say this with absolutely no evidence and only stating it as a hypothetical. But as an example it would be plausible that insider trading was involved.

▲

6 hours ago | parent | next [-]

[deleted]

▲

infecto 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Then why state it?

▲

axus 5 hours ago | parent [-]

Because Hacker News appreciates discussion of the theoretical, that exceeds the bounds of what mainstream society thought was possible.

▲

infecto 5 hours ago | parent [-]

[flagged]

	▲	jghn 5 hours ago \| parent [-]
		What I was specifically pointing at was it being a heavy AI play combined with the direct relationships he has at high levels with AI companies. For instance the chief of staff to Anthropic's CEO. What I was specifically referring to was a hypothetical that he could need a pardon. There was a question on what possible crime could be involved. All that said, I'd imagine if this was really happening that we wouldn't have today's headline in the first place.

▲

2PqboPPmKegvanx 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

trust us, it's quite clear you have no knowledge about the topic you are speaking on.