Tried both, 70mm (65mm is video, 5mm is audio) is just superior in every way. There's nothing out there that compares, digital projections are still far behind.

▲

rpdillon a day ago | parent | next [-]

Knowing nothing about this, it's a little bit wild to see two comments on the same page making diametrically opposed claims.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49122568

Does anybody have the technical knowledge to compare a RED video camera to 70mm IMAX (or maybe you just meant 70mm?)

	▲	sgt a day ago \| parent \| next [-]
		I wonder if he has ever watched e.g. Lawrence of Arabia in 70mm? Not blurry Edit: and yes, I meant 70mm super panavision
	▲	zipzinger a day ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		It’s because the person in the comment you linked to is talking shite.

▲

gempir a day ago | parent | prev [-]

Hmm are you sure 5mm is audio?

This article claims Audio is added via USB Stick or CD

https://www.theppt.org/rewind/articles/where-can-you-watch-t...

▲

sgt a day ago | parent [-]

I was referring to regular 70mm, in which 65mm is for the picture and 5mm is to allow for the sound channels. I am not surprised - squeezing even more out of the film, that IMAX would just put audio separately.

▲

gempir a day ago | parent [-]

I am also referring to regular 70mm, not IMAX, so is that part of the article.

> 70mm film uses DTS audio, which is supplied to the cinema on either CD-ROMs, or (more recently) via USB sticks.

	▲	sgt a day ago \| parent [-]
		I have never seen that in real life though, only regular 70 mm film of which 65 mm is definitely used for the picture and audio channels for the rest. E.g Lawrence of Arabia