|
| ▲ | nntwozz 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| WALL-E captured this sentiment. |
| |
|
| ▲ | skinfaxi 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| That would be an interesting legal case. I would expect it to lead to negligence on the part of the employer for lack of training, etc rather than attach to the employee pressing the button. |
| |
| ▲ | TeMPOraL 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | You get paid for having liability attach to you. Soon it may be the only thing you could be paid for. | | |
| ▲ | skinfaxi 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | Are employees usually liable for process-related issues? Like individual employees weren't liable for dispensing too-hot coffee but McDonalds was liable. Or how cops aren't liable in their individual capacity if it was a failure of training, etc. |
| |
| ▲ | inigyou 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Your job description won't say scapegoat - that would be too obvious. It'll be more like how Amazon drivers are forced to piss in jugs while driving. |
|
