This is a terrible analogy.

It's quite clear that the author means AI writing is now good enough to cause confusion and speculation as to whether a given piece of writing was human-authored.

The confusion and speculation caused by your nude transit adventure is about what the hell you're doing and why.

▲

mathisfun123 7 hours ago | parent [-]

> now good enough to cause confusion and speculation

since when is "confusion and speculation" an indicator of quality/goodness?

	▲	jibal 7 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Logic failure. > maybe LLMs are seen to write as well as humans because most humans have poor reading comprehension skills? Whoa, ironic.