| ▲ | gravypod 8 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||
What would the benefit of this be? If China stops open weights, US labs still have the intelligence frontier. Maybe once Chinese models have speed, cost, and intelligence beat but right now they don't. Undermining out entire economy by subsidizing the release of DIY versions of our main economic drive sounds like a huge win for China. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| [deleted] | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | applicative 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
> Maybe once Chinese models have speed, cost, and intelligence beat but right now they don't. Yes this is why I referred to 'months' and was downvoted by people who can't distinguish their politics from reality. You are restating exactly the text you are criticizing. This is the nature of mechanical parrotlike repetition of propaganda: a) You can have 'frontier' models with closed weights. Your sentence is basically a contraction within itself, again, the weight of ideology. b) No one actually knows whether or not the closed weights of Bytedance are beyond all existing frontiers. Again the weight of ideology blinds you to the fact that the real 800 lb gorilla of Chinese Ai is more closed than Anthropic. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||