| ▲ | nalekberov 10 hours ago | |
Real question is: how much those "fixed" bugs actually bothered the users to begin with? But since Google cares mostly about its investors, the numbers and a mention of Gemini in such a blog post are more important. | ||
| ▲ | Orphis 8 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |
Old bugs at the bottom of the prioritization list deserve to be fixed. Some were probably just theoretical "if we have over 2B of this item, it'll crash because X/Y/Z and that can be exploited", some are probably in rarely used features. Once the LLMs are done going through the code, the baseline will be all better and they will probably fix a lot less than they have now. Or they will have LLMs automatically check every single crash bug that has been submitted and take care of those too. I am assuming that they are probably already using this as an input source for their AI. | ||
| ▲ | why_only_15 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
The whole point is that these are security bugs that didn't necessarily bother people so far but could be exploited | ||
| ▲ | cyral 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
Didn't expect to see the goalposts moved to "AI can fix bugs but do they even matter" | ||