| ▲ | sim04ful 11 hours ago | |
Why didn't they increment the version as atleast a patch update | ||
| ▲ | bel8 an hour ago | parent | next [-] | |
So whoever is using DeepSeek V4 flash gets a massive upgrade without having to change any config. | ||
| ▲ | crvdgc 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
My guess would be the version number tracks the architecture change, not the weight change. | ||
| ▲ | rubslopes 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
I was also so annoyed by this. It makes communication all around difficult. Why don't they simply call it 4.1 flash? | ||
| ▲ | 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
| [deleted] | ||
| ▲ | kzrdude 10 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
Yes, and even if they seem to have updated endpoints in place they should assign the service a version number. | ||
| ▲ | markasoftware 11 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
They want to be the next Google it seems | ||