LLVM’s policy is that contributors can use whatever tools they would like to craft their contributions, but there must be a human in the loop. Contributors must read and review all LLM-generated code or text before they ask other project members to review it. The contributor is always the author and is fully accountable for their contributions.

https://llvm.org/docs/AIToolPolicy.html

LLMs are just tools. Humans are always accountable and in the end whatever tool is used the human is the one powering on the computer. Banning LLM is like banning compilers themselves or linters with auto fix capability, or anything else that appends new characters to text files without humans pressing keyboard buttons.

Hence, nonsense.

Also:

https://forge.sourceware.org/redi/gcc-wwwdocs/src/commit/4d0...

“ The commit message for any contribution of LLM-generated content must include an “Assisted-by:” tag.”

You serious?!

Maybe projects that announce such anti-“ai” policies seek reducing slop and spam. But come on. Policy is a text doc. The real deal is enforcing it. Ban idiots, not humans using whatever tools to get things done.