Thank you for putting the burden of proof on me instead of wearing that coat yourself- like the optics guy you are.

Well: Energy is 54 % of the money. Which is mostly for the industry up north. Renewables are decorative in the percentage.

Rail: 15.63 % - again mostly for the norther industrial zone- and some link ups with the southern neighbours (under the guise of helping the backwards regions down there).

Roads: 13.94 % same though alot of it is also for tourism. But also logistics.

Ports: 7% Sofar its mostly a trade and industry support program- bluntly directed at becoming the usas new industrial heartland.

The problematic part is that most of this infrastructure is private loan based investment in partnership with the mexican goverment. US-companies will own significant parts of the infrastructure down there and thus have a handle on the government.

This is mostly a "re-industrialize" the us plan without having the problems with industr you have in the us.

Girl, I'm not sure where you get off when you provided as much evidence as me.

I don't see how any of your statistics reinforce your original comment. Do you believe there are not poor people in the north and they all live in the south?

I share your concern about public-private partnerships, but Sheinbaum's infrastructure framework explicitly requires strategic assets, like in energy, oil, and power, remain under public control and have majority public oversight.