Totally untrue. Luna and Sonnet 5 are very comparable: https://artificialanalysis.ai/#intelligence

Luna is an extremely strong model.

> Luna is an extremely strong model.

By benchmarks, which sadly is a poor measure. Yes Luna is a good model under certain circumstances. Whether it is great for general usage is another story. Sonnet is definitely better when prompts are more vague and it needs to decide things. Luna generally sticks to things very strictly and goes off in bad ways.

▲

mediaman 3 hours ago | parent [-]

Yes but there is a big, big market for subagents to consume lots of tokens cheaply and condense information up to parent agents. Luna would not be my choice for planning. But an explorer to comb through a codebase to find relevant parts? Or for enterprise retrieval, where it needs to search across many different types of data to see where to focus efforts for a smarter model? Or to wake up periodically to evaluate some conditions and determine if a bigger model should be spun up? Definitely.

I've previously found flash (for all the hate it gets) to be good for these kinds of things. Haiku was fine but it's ancient.

	▲	re-thc 3 hours ago \| parent [-]
		> Yes but there is a big, big market for subagents to consume lots of tokens cheaply and condense information up to parent agents. That's again not some "intelligence factor" here. Different agents work for different use cases. Luna wins some. Terra wins some. Sonnet wins some. Flash was really good at exploring. So I'm not sure what your point is? There's a big market for everything. Even within the market you describe it's likely not a Luna-size fits all either.