Kinda some kettel logic here no? Is it not rigorous enough, or is it in-line with typical failure rates?

Rigor would be trying it more times so that you can perform statistical tests against some established baseline rate. Feasibility without funding would be the problem, as alluded to in another comment.

	▲	beepbooptheory 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		I am just trying to (gently) suggest you did not frame your points here in a good or convincing way, but thanks for the explanations here anyway. Sure sounds like there would be a lot to think about either way!