>You'd have a hard time convincing most American families to purchase anything with a >$1000 price tag.

Like cars, they'll likely purchase them through finance deals, with a monthly payment. Or perhaps even rent/lease them.

lovasoa 26 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

Of course we'll rent them! I don't even want to keep a robot in my flat all the time.

But that means speed does matter after all. The renting company will need to clean as many flats as possible with a single robot in a single day.

▲

qurren 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Cars are an absolute necessity in the US unless you live in one of the small handful of cities that have viable public transit. Different thing altogether.

Robots aren't a necessity, and for a price tag in the tens of thousands, most people will just mop their own floors and do their own laundry.

▲

micromacrofoot 38 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

$45k cars are not neccessary though, and that's the average american car loan today

	▲	bigfishrunning 31 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		That's really more of a financial literacy problem though. People don't see $45k car, they see $600/mo payment. And car dealers very much sell on the payment and not on the actual price.

▲

georgemcbay an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

> Robots aren't a necessity, and for a price tag in the tens of thousands, most people will just mop their own floors and do their own laundry.

And (regardless of the costs involved) if I were going to pay money to not do this stuff myself, I'd rather pay a human to do it because I know there are humans out there that could use the work and I value them much more than I value Google and other corporations making even more obscene amounts of money selling future e-waste.

▲

mbil 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Leasing seems like it could make sense given rapid upgrades in the technology. Why spend $15k on a home robot that will be obsoleted in the next few years?

	▲	garbageman an hour ago \| parent [-]
		Leasing is out, but locked-in subscriptions are in!

▲

kelvinjps10 an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

At that point why not have a human cleaning service it will probably be cheaper

▲

luckydata an hour ago | parent [-]

it's not cheap at all and the privacy and logistical implications of letting a stranger inside your house is something not everyone wants to deal with. I would rather have a robot.

	▲	blacksmith_tb 29 minutes ago \| parent \| next [-]
		Not to pull on the tinfoil hat, but I would assume most commercially available home cleaning robots will be covered with cameras, mics, and other sensors, and connected to their manufacturer's cloud... I don't pay for housecleaning, but I would vet humans quite differently.
	▲	infinitezest 13 minutes ago \| parent \| prev \| next [-]
		Suggesting that a robot is the more privacy friendly option is an interesting take.
	▲	stirfish 34 minutes ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		I don't trust a robot with my privacy, but I know Linette isn't building a profile of my shopping habits and Wi-Fi traffic. She is also careful to not let my cats out.

▲

meowkit 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Much easier to remotely brick a robot too I imagine

▲

michaelmrose an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

People are financing small consumer goods with 3 digit price tags because they can't afford their mediocre already leveraged life. They borrow high 4 to low 5 figures for a car because they can't get to work to earn money so they don't have to join the bums sleeping on the cardboard. They will not be borrowing high 5 figures to low 6 figures for Rosie the Robot.

If Rosie was the only output she would never happen. Rosie might happen as a side benefit of replacing American workers but only for the rich people.

The vast majority which may be replaced would probably be better off burning down the factory rather than celebrate their upcoming domestic helper.

	▲	randomNumber7 an hour ago \| parent [-]
		If you have a robot doing household work you can spend more time at work /S