| ▲ | andsoitis 2 hours ago | |||||||
If all goes well, imagine a world in which you work because you want to not because you have to. | ||||||||
| ▲ | IAmGraydon 21 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
I'm really curious - are the people who keep saying this in denial or lacking in a basic education in economics? You can imagine all you want, but this is absolutely not a possible outcome. | ||||||||
| ▲ | mmh0000 an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
I think this is way too optimistic. I suspect these things will be only available to the already-quite-wealthy. While the poor (i.e., not billionaires) are left to rot and starve without jobs, property, or livelihoods. Then, when the poors (i.e. us) become too much of a headache, these things will be deployed to murder the poors (i.e. me). I am imagining a world somewhere between the movie Elysium and Oblivion. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | georgemcbay an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
> If all goes well, imagine a world in which you work because you want to not because you have to. And if all goes bad, imagine a world in which you and your family are homeless and starve to death. Luckily the politicians and business leaders in place today who are going to be responsible for navigating us to one of these outcomes are the adults in the room, very ethical, even keeled and not the least bit corrupt. So... we should be fine! /s | ||||||||