| ▲ | Pgtestdb's template cloning approach to testing is fast(brandur.org) | |
| 9 points by peterldowns an hour ago | 2 comments | ||
| ▲ | peterldowns 23 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | |
Just want to say thank you to Brandur for doing such a cool experiment. Last year I actually explored the River test suite to understand how they made it work so quickly — he's understating it when he says their implementation is "gold standard." I'm both surprised and excited to hear that pgtestdb, out of the box, can give anyone a ~nearly as fast experience. Going to have to throw some tokens at pooling... very interesting idea. Thank you, Brandur! | ||
| ▲ | lukasschwab an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | |
> I’m going to add a recommendation in our docs for pgtestdb, particularly for users aiming to test end-to-end (i.e. job inserted by client → fully completed by worker). That's exactly what I did to learn River — implementing simple apps and testing their execution with pgtestdb: https://github.com/lukasschwab/river-playground The starter skeleton was LLM-generated and not quite perfect, but discovering the coding agent's mistakes was satisfying in its own right. | ||