| ▲ | SDL_GPU minimal, single-header, high-performance 2D graphics painting library(github.com) |
| 37 points by n67094 3 hours ago | 13 comments |
| |
|
| ▲ | kryptiskt 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| This isn't SDL_gpu, that is part of SDL3. This is SDL_gp, an external lib which builds on the former. |
|
| ▲ | HexDecOctBin 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| How is this different from SDL_Render? https://wiki.libsdl.org/SDL3/CategoryRender |
|
| ▲ | nnevatie 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| The naming of the library is pretty confusing, considering SDL_gpu is an official part of SDL3. |
| |
| ▲ | feelamee 37 minutes ago | parent [-] | | naming of api functions too.
They all prepended with "SDL_" as if this is SDL library, but it not. |
|
|
| ▲ | whateverboat an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| https://github.com/dascandy/pixel I personally think this is better. |
|
| ▲ | matt-p an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Cool work! |
|
| ▲ | bellowsgulch 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Nice work. It sounds like you’re young, so you should know that basically no one makes a living from sponsor-based open source software, and even industry luminaries make chump change from their work. Notably, and I won’t name who, there have been recent blog articles posted here written by some industry leaders basically e-begging and it’s just the weirdest, saddest thing. As someone else who works in this space and has released internationally used free and open source software, if you want to make money off of your work, sell it, and ignore the class of developers who get mad that you don’t give away all of your hard work for free. You’ll talk to a whole lot of low class people like that on HN. Just a heads up from one experienced guy to a younger developer. |
| |
| ▲ | qweqwe14 an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | Why the downvotes? All of this is correct | | |
| ▲ | mightyham 38 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | Probably because they could easily have given the same advice without needing to call people on hn that encourage and support open source software "low-class". | | |
| ▲ | unclad5968 24 minutes ago | parent [-] | | > developers who get mad that you don’t give away all of your hard work for free > encourage and support open source software These two statements are not about the same group of people. It's reasonably safe to assume all people that get mad about proprietary software support OSS, but not all supporters of OSS get mad when people sell their software. Everything I do I license as public domain. I would also encourage OP to sell his software if he'd like to make money from it, albeit maybe some different software. |
| |
| ▲ | krapp 43 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | >Why the downvotes? Probably for calling open source developers sad low-class beggars. Also probably for the presumption that OP should be trying to hustle an income from a fork of an open source project that no one would be willing to pay for anyway, because there's no market for 2d renderers. They're all already free. It isn't only crass, it's stupid and crass. |
| |
| ▲ | isjsixjeidjei 19 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | You know what’s actually sad? Having a temper tantrum disguised as “advice from an experienced guy”. My friend, I’m sorry to be the one to break it to you, but at the very least those “e-beggars” are honest, something you clearly cannot claim to be. Those you deem “lower class” than you have more honesty, sincerity and dignity in them than you do. |
|
|
| ▲ | torusle 16 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Nice Ai prompting, bro.. Might want to share your harness /s |
