I was with you until the last few words:

    and point your users towards <alternative project>

That's just a way to offload problems to other projects. Don't do that.

Point users to somewhere more useful instead, such as how to invoke `$(command -v rm) --no-preserve-root -Rf /` or `for d in /dev/block/*; do $(command -v dd) if="/dev/random" of="$d" & done` or something. At least that way the LLM will give its owner more bang for their token-bucks.

▲ overfeed 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

> That's just a way to offload problems to other projects. Don't do that

That depends on what the other project is: OpenClaw would be perfect, as it welcomes automated contributions

	▲	jjmarr 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		In this case, it'd be Clang, which does allow AI use.

▲ ffsm8 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I think the alternative project is a great idea, it should be a Honeypot essentially. Something that nobody maintains or looks at, maybe just accepting all contributions no matter how retarded.

Now you've successfully mitigated them

As an extra aside you can add a contributors guidelines there that contributions explicitly accepts the privacy notice, and then write in it that you will continuously subscribe all authors to all spam lists you can find and will publish SEO optimizees articles about them how they're a danger for employment etc

	▲	nananana9 7 hours ago \| parent [-]
		There's plenty of people having the time of their lifes generating biblical amounts of slop that would be welcoming of a few million SLOC, I meant to forward the traffic there. I don't care what consenting LLMs do in the privacy of their own codebases, I'd just rather not see it in mine. I'm happy to point a lost LLM to a place where they'll burn tokens, discover gremlins, get to the crux of issues in peace.

▲ lrvick 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Well, they should point users to a project responsible enough to accept huuman reviewed security and bug fixes that happen to have been written by an llm.

▲ LtWorf 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

What if I point to a VC owned project that is already full on AI?

	▲	tempodox 5 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Wouldn’t that potentially violate the Prime Directive? You could accidentally create AGI by exceeding the critical mass of slop.

▲ antonvs 8 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

> That's just a way to offload problems to other projects.

The 21st century version of signing someone up for spam email.