being locked out = less profit = firing management by shareholders

it will solve by consumers, don't worry

The number of people who are marginalised is... marginal. By definition it doesn't have a sensible impact on profit. That's precisely why it is a problem to be marginalised.

▲

MichaelZuo 7 hours ago | parent [-]

Isn’t that… life?

Even literal regulated electricity utilities aren’t expected to provide service to every last marginal customer.

For example, a poor old grandma missing many electricity bill payments usually will see leniency if she is polite, the utility eventually won’t try to collect cash anymore and instead put a lien on the home while continuing to provide service.

But if the billing department receives multiple threats from her, then they may just cut the service.

▲

palata an hour ago | parent | next [-]

Not entirely sure what you are trying to say, other than you don't really care as long as you are not the one who is marginalised.

Anyway it's generally a tradeoff: is it worth doing it? By adding very strict age verification systems and marginalising people, do we make society globally better or not? Will those age verification systems work to prevent underage people from accessing the stuff we don't want them to access in the first place? Not clear. If they do, will it result in underage people being better? Not clear. And if it does, will it have been worth the damage on the people it marginalised? Not clear.

▲

johnnyanmac 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I really hope our freedom's aren't relinquished on a platform as fortified as "It is what it is".

▲

MichaelZuo 4 hours ago | parent [-]

This doesn’t make sense?

How does “freedom” relate to an electrical utility deciding whether to cut service?

	▲	johnnyanmac 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		"Freemdom" is accepting that mostly marginalized people get their power cut because they are marginalized. Your reaction to that is to shrug and move on instead of investigating the systems below that keep the marginalized as so. Even if we take marginalization out of it, this is the same kind of system that let's Healthcare recklessly utilize AI Systems to automatically reject patients' care, with a Herculean effort required to find a human to talk to. Its easy yo shrug until you are hallucinated into their crosshair. But sure, that's "freedom".

▲

j16sdiz 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

It won't.

Do you aware how many people are locked out from access of the bank because the bank think they are too risky by some algorithm and no human review?

And people got rejected for flying because they have same name as somebody on no fly list?

▲

upheaval7276 10 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

yep, just like cases now where people are locked out of their accounts for no reason with no recourse. totally solved!

▲

brookst 10 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

In the aggregate sure. But do you really think profit motive means they will be precise for every individual?