| ▲ | PunchyHamster 2 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||
> If you have statefulness + mutability then you must do away with concurrency; a different way to avoid the same concurrent overwriting problem mentioned above. Last time I checked we had plenty of concurrency primitives allowing for that; you might need to wait few tens or hundreds of nanoseconds for a lock (or few orders more over network), but it works just fine | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | naasking 29 minutes ago | parent [-] | ||||||||||||||||
All of them depend on temporarily suspending concurrency in order to synchronize. Even atomic exchange operations are like this at the hardware level. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||