| ▲ | alan-crowe a day ago | ||||||||||||||||
That depends on where you live. If nuclear power is trying to match a fluctuating load it needs storage for a day or two, to escape the Xenon dead time. But solar power for air-conditioning only needs an hour or two of storage to bridge from peak solar at noon, to maximum demand mid-afternoon. On the other hand I live in Scotland. Solar power for space heating needs to save the summer sun for six months to heat homes in January. Ouch! Adding a day or two of storage to a nuclear power plant is much more practical. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | audunw 16 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
If the energy you need is in the form of heating, it’s actually surprisingly viable to store energy for months. Heat batteries is probably the cheapest and easiest way to store energy for the long term. It’s just that it’s horribly inefficient to go back to electricity. So it’s more of an issue when you want to use that excess solar to power your computer in winter. If not nuclear, I think the northern regions need to focus on geothermal (Quaise?) and trash burning (yes, recycle first, but eventually everything non metal degrades and should be incinerated) | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | rcxdude a day ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
I mean, Scotland has more wind power than it can use (or transfer to England) at the moment, so solar is probably not the main focus. The price of nuclear plants also means you can afford to overbuild renewables by quite a lot to make up for seasonal variation and still come in at the same price. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||