> “The pattern invites us to read welfare as macroprudential policy, part of the toolkit that keeps financial openness politically survivable. Where redistribution runs vertically and broadly, the welfare state itself absorbs the shocks of global finance. Where it runs horizontally, protecting established insiders while the rest carry the risk, governments buy stability at the financial border instead. Capital controls work as a cheap, imperfect substitute for redistribution. They calm an exposed society without asking anyone at the top to pay.”

Their analysis will yield false conclusions because they’re completely ignoring a number of variables.

For instance, the USSR had capital controls for financial and political reasons. The article assumes that politics plays no role, only finance.

Wall Street influences US financial policy, but so does politics.

The laziness of this research is shocking, so I looked up the author. He’s an author for the Communist blog “Jacobin.”

Why is this on Hacker News?

This paper is flimsy propaganda.

https://jacobin.com/author/martino-comelli