My comment is more or less "I get the problems and I am not seeing the market agree that there even is a problem". It's capitalism manifest: squeeze the workers as hard as you can, get the next batch when the current one gets drained. Those incentives always existed and AI amplified them, that's all there is to it really.

Maybe the article is introspective, sure, but I am beyond the phase of realizing those kinds of problems and so to me it reads like meaningless repetition and merits only a sarcastic "Oh really? Never would have guessed." eyebrow-assisted remark from me.

I get it that's not a popular point of view -- HN really loves their virtue signalling and the ever-present "we must do something!"... whoever "we" is, that's never specified, naturally. But I am not karma farming, so people can and should freely cast their votes on my posted comments.