> Care about what?

About what you yourself said? "Canada could use a system to encourage the wealthy to claim income, where that is incentivized by being able to vote".

The ultra-wealthy can already influence elections in very significant ways. Getting 5 votes instead of 1, which makes no actual difference to any election, is not something that will suddenly make the ultra wealthy wanting to pay more income tax.

What does make a difference though, is if you can prevent a lot of lower income voters from casting their ballots.

Also, no, I'm not buying your unfounded claim that Tobi is just joking bro. His doubling down on it in other comments + his past make it clear to me that is seriously thinks like this.

▲

win311fwg 3 hours ago | parent [-]

> I'm not buying your unfounded claim that Tobi is just joking bro.

Fair enough. Let me be a little more precise here: Eric Thor was clearly poking the bear of those who believe that the wealthy don't pay tax. I mean, his voting suggestion concludes with exactly that. Maybe Tobi is so far out to lunch that he didn't notice and took it as an actual plan, but, then again, if you are suggesting that he is that far out to lunch what are we to do with that?

> His doubling down on it in other comments

The fact that he was writing comments about it suggests that he doesn't take it too seriously. Nobody of sound mind wastes time writing stupid comments on the internet if they have an actual motive. They go out into the real world and make it happen.

If he is completely out to lunch like you suggest then anything is possible, but the more likely explanation still seems to be making fun of those who don't believe the wealthy pay tax. If people were making shit up about you, claiming that you didn't pay any tax, you'd likely end up making fun of them too.

▲

sailingparrot 2 hours ago | parent [-]

> Nobody of sound mind wastes time writing stupid comments on the internet if they have an actual motive.

I mean Musk? You even used it as an example of "just trolling" in your previous message. He invested north of $300M+ in the last presidential election, also injected massive amounts in various local races, as well as foreign elections.

What more do you need to take them seriously? Even if somehow Musk was doing all of this to troll people because to him $500M is nothing, the impact on those elections is real, so it doesn't even matter what is internal reasons are.

▲

win311fwg an hour ago | parent [-]

> I mean Musk?

One who is not normally considered to be of sound mind, but you do you.

> What more do you need to take them seriously?

A good idea? The voting thought, while possibly an interesting thought experiment, is not suitable for execution. Why would I take it seriously?

> the impact on those elections is real

Maybe you aren't asking why I would take them seriously, when there was nothing presented that is worth taking seriously, but why do others take their hobo shouting on the street ramblings seriously, presumably only because they have wealth? The other hobos on the street seem to be happily ignored.

Good question, but one I do not have the answer to. I'm still trying to figure out how these particular hobos shouting nonsense on the street corner became people I am aware of. They're just people, same as all the others that manage to remain anonymous. Definitely some kind of malfunction in my brain going on there.

	▲	sailingparrot 2 minutes ago \| parent \| next [-]
		> but why do others take their hobo shouting on the street ramblings seriously, presumably only because they have wealth? The other hobos on the street seem to be happily ignored. The wealth is precisely what allows those hobos to act on their crazy ideas and and impact us all. The other hobos on the street without wealth have no actual impact thus we just ignore them. I don't think its that complicated.
	▲	cindyllm an hour ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		[dead]