| ▲ | gruez 5 hours ago |
| >There are many other registrars out there if you are willing to transfer and for $3K I'd be transfering my domains and then filing a chargeback. If what hover said is true (ie. "the .sexy registry (Uniregistry) sets prices as it sees fit, decided to jack up the renewal cost at the last minute because they can"), trying to transfer to another registar won't fix the issue, because they'll just charge the same price. |
|
| ▲ | ktm5j 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| It will fix the problem of having paid $3000. Just want to add that while Hover might not be at fault, I don't think OP is either. I would have done the same thing (read the first renewal email and ignored the rest). I think Hover should change something, like adding PRICE CHANGE to the email headline or something similar. |
|
| ▲ | joshstrange 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| True, but you can abandon that domain (OP already said it was mostly a joke website) and transfer all the ones you do care about. If this .sexy domain is their only domain there then it's even easier, just chargeback and be done with it. |
| |
| ▲ | tossandthrow 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | Charge backs are generally not for returns. If the charge was legal and within contract and customer regulations, then Hover might very well just challange the charge back. | | |
| ▲ | joshstrange 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | I think the OP has a pretty good case for this being an unauthorized charge. Additionally, as someone who has been on the receiving end of chargebacks a number of times I can tell you merchants have a higher burden of proof in things like this. Even submitting perfect evidence can get ruled in favor of the cardholder. | | |
| ▲ | fckgw 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | Wouldn't the merchant's proof be the two emails they sent regarding the upcoming renewal with charges listed? | | |
| ▲ | joshstrange 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Perhaps? Chargebacks are a completely black box though and the entity that makes the decision is the cardholder's issuer so they often rule in favor of the cardholder if there is even a chance they are right (in my experience). I've had what I thought was bullet-proof evidence before and lost an appeal (as a merchant). | |
| ▲ | anigbrowl 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | If they sent an email saying or clearly implying it would renew at $38 and the following 2 emails didn't have any clear warning about price changes in the subject line, I think OP would be quite justified in having assumed they were just empty reminders. |
|
|
|
|