> > Indeed, if ratings requests were initiated by Apple, then Apple could go as far as to ban developer-initiated ratings requests in the App Store.

> They did! It's a one-shot dialog now.

No. Apple provides an API, but Apple doesn't ask for reviews. The app has to initiate the process to ask for a review (through Apple's API). That is what the developer highlights: If Apple were to solicit reviews from customers, then said API could be retired and apps could reasonably be banned entirely from soliciting reviews. As it stands, they're caught in a tragedy of the commons, with unscrupulous developers winning (e.g. with fake reviews, or the annoying "are you satisfied" pop-up before displaying the Apple API).

▲

ezfe a day ago | parent | next [-]

The API limits how frequently (3/year) *and* can be fully blocked by any user for all apps.

They do get banned, effectively.

▲

spacedcowboy a day ago | parent [-]

And there is nothing to stop a developer putting up their own nag screen as many times as they like, only pushing through to the real one when they get a good response... And they do.

	▲	ezfe a day ago \| parent [-]
		If the OP did that then they deserve a 1 star rating. If they used Apple's system then they deserve a rating that doesn't deduct for the popup (and evidence seems to show that's what happens)

▲

ceejayoz a day ago | parent | prev [-]

> Apple provides an API, but Apple doesn't ask for reviews. The app has to initiate the process to ask for a review (through Apple's API).

I'm aware. The API to do so limits how often you can ask, because of the incessant nagging people did. Minor correction to my earlier comment: It's 3x/year, not 1x. https://developer.apple.com/app-store/ratings-and-reviews/

The nagging devs now get around this by doing their own prompts before it. (As many shitty websites do for web-based push notifications, for similar reasons.)