| ▲ | pc86 an hour ago | |||||||
Your example is both bad and irrelevant. Two completely unrelated things can be true simultaneously. | ||||||||
| ▲ | radiorental an hour ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
I'm not seeing this example as unrelated. E.g. If a seller knows I've been searching for flu remedies, I've made a social media post related to the illness. Then I go to the pharmacy and everything related to alleviating those symptoms is more expensive for me. Put simply, if they know you absolutely need something, they will leverage that information. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | 8note 36 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
its still surveillance pricing - the payment from the working class here is their labour. its the same exploitation in both cases | ||||||||
| ▲ | lokar an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
I can’t quite understand your point. My example was a real reported behavior. | ||||||||