Ditched Adobe Lightroom 10+ years ago in favour of Darktable and never looked back. It was the first FOSS software, which showed me how green the grass can get.

▲

ghostly_s 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Don't lead people down a fruitless path. From their own FAQ:

>Is darktable a free Lightroom alternative?¶ Yes and no. Darktable is an alternative to Lightroom the same way any other raw editor is, since it edits raw files, but it would be a mistake to think it’s a direct replacement. Other than both being raw editors with photo library management, and looking somewhat similar, they have very little in common.

What they mean is, Darktable has very capable editing functionality, but its "library management" is such an afterthought that I would challenge whether it even deserves to be called library management. It seems to be oriented around the design philosophy that photographers should be organizing their library with CLI tools.

	▲	Mashimo an hour ago \| parent \| next [-]
		When I still used it, I only ever opened the folder with the files I wanted to edit. I had folders based on dates YYYY.MM.DD - Eventname. No need for cli. I still do the same now for CaptureOne to be honest.
	▲	speed_spread 16 minutes ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		I wish Darktable and Immich could be integrated into a single system.

▲

pnut 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Pretty sure Darktable only supports openCL and not Metal for MacOS.

OpenCL is unsupported for M1/2/3/4/5, which makes RAW file processing, batch workflows, basically everything, unusably slow.

Unless something has changed in the past few months, Darktable is dead on MacOS with no fix in sight.

	▲	wizzledonker an hour ago \| parent \| next [-]
		I use it on Mac - I didn’t notice too much. There’s some GPU usage, I assume Apple still has some deprecated OpenCL drivers kicking around that it knows to use.
	▲	Yossarrian22 2 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		I used Darktable on Mac yesterday