Your example actually demonstrates why anthropomorphism is a bad idea.

LLMs are vulnerable to classes of attacks that humans just aren’t. In your framework, the way to prevent attacks is to… invent human consciousness?? It’s an impossible goal.

What invent human consciousness?

> LLMs are vulnerable to classes of attacks that humans just aren’t

Name three that don't have direct analogues with humans.

> LLMs are vulnerable to classes of attacks that humans just aren’t.

Assume a human with complete credulity and gullibility. That's a human whose behaviour would be reasonably analogous to how an LLM processes input. The mitigation would be generalized intelligence and "common sense".

FWIW I also think anthropomorphizing LLMs is a bad idea. I think we can analogize their processing to human behavior without anthropomorphizing them.