| ▲ | andersmurphy 7 hours ago | |
Personally, I think the better way to tackle sqlite_busy is to have a single writer managed at the application level. That effectively eliminates sqlite_busy in the context of a single process. > To ensure write operations don't suffer from disk synchronization bottlenecks, pair WAL mode with the following pragma Only do this if you are prepared to sacrifice durability (i.e can afford to lose transactions). | ||