| ▲ | areoform an hour ago | |
I'm glad that you brought that up, genuinely so.I want to ask you a question, do you feel like that this is the problem being solved by the current "safety features?" Let me rephrase my question, do Anthropic and OpenAI implement the same "guardrails" and "safety features" for the NSA? Does the Mythos NSA Edition™ have these restrictions? What about the one that's running as a part of Maven? How does stopping me from asking about rabbit sex protect you from nut jobs with a security clearance using these systems to go off and make weapons? Because this has happened before. The only successful bioweapons attack in US history was done by a guy who worked at Fort Detrick. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2001_anthrax_attacks The only private organization successful enough to make biological and chemical weapons is Aum Shinrikyo and they had university affiliation and nearly a billion dollars in the 1990s. The guy who led Aum's bioweapons program was
and,
https://irp.fas.org/congress/1995_rpt/aum/part04.htmand,
and,
Can you tell me how no one noticed them importing an absurd amount of precursors, industrial-grade HEPA filters, fermenters, and lab equipment?It's because they'd recruited members of the military, bribed local policemen and politicians, and used their sway to silence critics (or kill them). How does stopping me from asking Claude about rabbit sex stop people like them? From where I'm standing, Anthropic and OpenAI would have sold Aum a subscription. The Fort Detrick guy would have access via the US Government and Aum had university affiliation. I am yet to read a serious proposal that actually deals with these risks and the other real risks of this technology. | ||