| ▲ | gregwebs 4 hours ago |
| Just ran it on a small repo. It ran for almost an hour and then got interrupted. It drained half my weekly usage on a Pro plan. npx codex-security scan .
[00:00] Preparing scan
[00:00] Authentication: stored Codex credentials.
[00:03] Preparing scan
[01:20] Running scan
[01:20] Preflight: worker delegation supported (up to 8 worker slots).
[52:47] Running scan
codex-security: Could not save the Codex Security scan: Repository HEAD changed while the scan was running. Start a new scan.
codex-security: Partial output was kept at ...
|
|
| ▲ | brap 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| Working as intended |
|
| ▲ | alansaber 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Classic. |
|
| ▲ | paulddraper 35 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| So it drained $5? Can’t speak to the results, but the cost isn’t high. |
|
| ▲ | teaearlgraycold 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I plan to hack it to use openrouter and Kimi K3 or GLM 5.2 to keep expenses reasonable. For context can you share the line count? |
| |
| ▲ | typpo an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | No need to hack it, we'll add proper support for this. | |
| ▲ | st3fan 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Give this a try https://infosec.exchange/@st3fan/117000352530023032 | |
| ▲ | ymir_e 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | FYI: Kimi K3 is relatively expensive on open router API pricing for agentic tasks, or at least that's been my experience playing around with it. | | |
| ▲ | teaearlgraycold 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | They just opened the weights. I expect competition from various providers will drop the price a bit. But you're right. I'd hope a model closer to GLM 5.2's price would be sufficiently useful. | | |
| ▲ | dannyw 17 minutes ago | parent [-] | | A license and presumably revshare is required for large scale inference as a service of Kimi K3. There's clearly something going on right now with every router at the same or higher price as the Moonshot list price. So I wouldn't count on competition if $/mil token is actually set by Moonshot, but I would expect $/tok to drop when there's a more competitive frontier open weight model. |
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | hellohello2 an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Pro is 10$ a month. You get what you pay for lol. |
| |
| ▲ | oefrha 36 minutes ago | parent [-] | | No, Pro is $100 or $200/mo. Even Plus is $20/mo. Where's this $10/mo Pro plan? |
|
|
| ▲ | dangelosaurus 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Oof, that's a bad outcome. Half your weekly usage and a 50-minute scan just to get a HEAD error at the end is not acceptable. --max-cost can help limit estimated spend, but that doesn't fix the underlying problem or give you your quota back. We need to handle a changing checkout and partial results much better. Sorry you ran into this. Please send me an email. |
| |
| ▲ | alasano an hour ago | parent [-] | | Damn. Just ran it and it used 5 years worth of Pro usage in 5 minutes. If ya wouldn't mind crediting me a quick 60 months that would be great. |
|