| ▲ | hallvard a day ago | |
Fair points; the reason for asking is that it seems counterintuitive from the outside perspective for you to maintain/extend the pip interface as well? And of course that some colleagues of mine insist on using `uv pip` for anything and everything, which feels wrong… Granted it’s a great feature which made the transition to uv smooth in the first place. | ||
| ▲ | zanie a day ago | parent [-] | |
So far the maintenance burden has been quite bearable and extending pip provides us with an opportunity to explore and encourage improvements upstream which are still beneficial to a lot of people. | ||