Well made website IMO. Gets to the point with plenty of easy-to-understand evidence and calls to action.

Feels like every other site that AI generates. Hard to tell what the creators believe and what is just probabilistically generated.

I wouldn't be surprised if AI was used to generate it. But it mostly feels that way becuase it uses Astro. There's no other obvious AI tells.

	▲	user102030 an hour ago \| parent [-]
		Yeah, I suppose I was just responding to the Astro aesthetics. Copy seems human-written when taking a deeper look.

semiquaver 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Nothing about this site screams AI to me. The site does its job well. Not sure what you are complaining about.

I disagree. To me, it's clear from how comprehensive the site is that they are very invested in the editorial outcomes of what they've published.