| ▲ | r0fl 3 hours ago | |||||||
Leasing isn’t “I can’t afford to buy it.” It’s about capital allocation. Why would I tie up $1,200 upfront in a device that’s going to be obsolete in a couple of years when I can spread the cost over time, preserve cash flow, and (if it’s a legitimate business expense) deduct the lease payments? Keeping $1,200 in my business earning a return is often worth more than prepaying for a depreciating asset. People happily lease $80,000 vehicles for exactly these reasons. Applying the same logic to a $1,200 phone isn’t irrational, just the same financing decision at a much smaller scale. | ||||||||
| ▲ | thewebguyd 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
Yeah everyone's naysaying this but it seems like a no brainer? There's no interest, no fees. The total lease price (if you buy out at the end) is the same as the retail price. There's no downside to it at all. If you are someone who upgrades annually, you're now paying ~$599 split over 12 payments vs. ~$1199 up front and either trading in or trying to sell your last gen privately. It works out to about even on a trade-in->upgrade every year cycle, only you don't have to fork over the $600 up front. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | likelybot 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
Bro what | ||||||||