Investors expect that they will, I guess. If you really believe the strong ai use cases (like exponential improvements, or it replacing hundreds of knowledge workers at every company" then maybe this isn't unreasonable.

▲

misterderpie 5 hours ago | parent [-]

If many people lose their jobs, thus consumers having less and less money, where would that money come from?

▲

ben_w 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Depends how many people, but don't forget that:

1) people like me exist: I don't live in the USA, yet it is possible for me to buy things which are made in the USA

2) fiat money is only created or deleted by laws the government controls (plus a tiny quantity from forgery and damage to coins and notes), so everyone losing their jobs doesn't make the money disappear, just who has it available to spend

3) previous waves of automation have created new business opportunities; while this has not been too good for the people who lost jobs to the automation, it has generally boosted the overall economies this happened in, so it is absolutely possible to wipe out tech employees without it seriously harming consumers collectively

▲

nemomarx 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

If you look at recent trends in consumer spending, a lot more of it is from the upper classes and less from the middle. Selling services to the rich can displace the loss of white collar workers. (in theory). as a bonus, ideally you create some more really wealthy people to spend on things during this shift.

	▲	misterderpie 5 hours ago \| parent [-]
		I'm yet to see what part of AI really wealthy people would like to spend their money on. It's not like we can get AI Yachts and AI Rockets. What would the premium product for the upper class be?