Ad-hominem is what you resort to when having no argument ;)

"They know that their remarks are frivolous, open to challenge. But they are amusing themselves, for it is their adversary who is obliged to use words responsibly, since he believes in words."

Sartre didn't respect your kind and I don't either.

▲

lostmsu an hour ago | parent | next [-]

Sounds like Sartre didn't respect your kind, or am I misreading it? He is the one using the words responsibly and you are the one who made a frivolous remark.

Sounds like you also don't respect your own kind.

	▲	sjsdaiuasgdia an hour ago \| parent [-]
		Do you have specific evidence of an educational institution that added "gender studies" and concurrently removed "personal finance, economics, and rational decision making?" Because that's what meta_gunslinger claimed while you say he was using words "responsibly". Who do you think "my own kind" are, anyhow?

▲

meta_gunslinger 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Sartre was a nihilistc pdf-file and a prolific liar. I don't have any respect for his ilk either.

	▲	sjsdaiuasgdia 3 hours ago \| parent [-]
		What was that about ad hominems again? ;-)