Remix.run Logo
rileymat2 2 hours ago

> The US government can restrict access with IP blocks and limit inference capacity with export controls, but these measures are not effective in deterring malicious actors.

But aren't we talking about import controls, and the import of information itself? This has serious First Amendment ramifications.

mrandish an hour ago | parent | next [-]

> This has serious First Amendment ramifications.

Also, the 5th and 9th amendments. For the government to sustain a blanket prohibition on any U.S. citizen even possessing what amounts to a broad, economically significant technology will very likely require a new act of congress which specifically defines and limits what is banned, when, why and how. SCOTUS will almost certainly see it as a "major question" subject to 'strict scrutiny' which is a very high bar.

jimbokun 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

LLM weights are not protected speech.

rileymat2 an hour ago | parent | next [-]

https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/regulations-targeting-l...

The truth is no one knows, which is why it is first amendment ramifications. Eventually it will be “decided”, but the arguments indicate any decision will be of political desire, not logic, either way. Both sides have a strong case.

zephen 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Do you have a citation that shows that this issue has been settled?

stale2002 an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Actually yes they are. Code has been determined to be protected speech.

ElevenLathe an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

Why not?