It was the foundation of science that information is shared and you can find papers and patents for a lot of dangerous stuff.

Of course with LLMs it's easier, but I don't think the difference is too big. You would still need some skills to follow through.

▲

andy99 4 hours ago | parent [-]

Right, it’s really a foundation of post enlightenment society. These people, Dario et al, would have wanted to ban sharing information about calculus or Newtonian physics because of “safety” - it’s trying to go back to the dark ages where only priests could read

▲

afthonos 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I am truly at a loss to communicate with someone who genuinely believes that knowing Newtonian physics and being able to hack into any target at will are the same thing.

	▲	anon373839 2 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		This is only because you've genuinely internalized Anthropic's propaganda. I'm only half joking. To me, it's incredible to think that the solution to security holes is to lock down access to information in the vain hope of keeping the holes obscured. Any knowledge can be reframed as dangerous black magic that should only be wielded in the trusted hands of the elite, if you are inclined to buy into that kind of narrative. Frontier labs have shrieked about safety for so long, with so little to show for it, that it's become a joke.
	▲	dustin_vk 2 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		Open models are crucial to protect ourselves against other AI attacks. Otherwise it's just going to be criminals, government, and other nefarious groups using them against humanity with no real defense. The Pandora's box on AI has been opened. Now we must deal with it. Burying our heads in the sand under restrictive policy is the worst reaction..

▲

jimbokun 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

This is a stupid argument.

Claiming the person who you disagree with believes some stupid thing they never hinted at, and using that as the reason for disagreeing with them.