| ▲ | tekacs 5 hours ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
This is completely backwards. Cybersecurity has an attacker-defender asymmetry that heavily, HEAVILY favors defenders. For starters, a defender gets to pick the surface area, an attacker has to work with what they're given. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | dwaltrip 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
The saying that stuck with me was "defenders have to be right 100% of the time, while attackers only have to be right once". You are suggesting this isn't correct? > a defender gets to pick the surface area What do you mean? You don't pick what you need to defend. Unless you choose not to build a feature. But that's a product design choice... Not a cybersecurity strategy. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | paxys 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
This makes no sense. Why do defenders get to pick the surface area? You can be attacked from anywhere. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | shepherdjerred 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
I think the point you're trying to make is that you can always make your exposed surface area smaller But that, of course, is not going to survive contact with reality | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||