Well, actually, Kavak is a generic framework. QBasic was just a stepping stone I wanted to demonstrate there. Since it won't be the flagship, I can't focus on it too much, but I'll try to improve it as much as I can.

Thanks.

Sure I agree - I just think you'd be better served by calling it "BASIC", since its more representative of what you're trying to achieve. The problem with calling it QBASIC is that anyone who grew up using the Microsoft interpreter in the 80s and early 90s will find issues. Like Me :)