|
| ▲ | ayewo 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| Understood but sharing your existing devops resources with this will soon become a bottleneck especially when any major downtime will keep several engineers (and long-running agents) blocked from any meaningful work until availability improves. |
| |
| ▲ | layer8 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | Not my experience, from an SMB that maintains its own hardware and services. You have a certain contingent of competent engineers who distribute their work across projects, and it generally works out fine. Or course you plan with some redundancy and fall-back plans in your systems. | | |
| ▲ | ayewo an hour ago | parent [-] | | The top poster mentioned LLM spend of millions/month to justify the estimated capex of $6m to self-host Kimi on own infra. Add to this number another $1.5m/yr in opex, so not sure I’d call such an enterprise wealthy enough to spend those kinds of sums on LLMs an “SMB”. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | JacobAsmuth an hour ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Now you're thinking like management! |
