| ▲ | pohl 2 hours ago |
| Does that data exclude FFI wrappers, which necessarily must be unsafe? If not, don’t put much stock in it. |
|
| ▲ | simonw 2 hours ago | parent [-] |
| No, it's a raw count. I get that there's a baseline of unsafe that's necessary, but I was under the impression that some of those unsafes were in places where they could be replaced by more idiomatic Rust at a later date. |
| |
| ▲ | tomlockwood 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | I don't think that's true. I think a fair chunk of them are places where Bun is handed a pointer by WebKit or something similar. I believe they write about this a little. | | |
| ▲ | insanitybit 35 minutes ago | parent [-] | | I think there's a reasonable expectation that unsafe could still be reduced by having shared, safer abstractions - that would lead to fewer `unsafe` results because the `unsafe` would be contained. I'm surprised that this isn't a higher priority target for them. |
|
|
