| ▲ | shimman an hour ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Might surprise people to learn but the law isn't the final arbiter on what is moral or just. The law only decides what is legal and as we've seen over our lived history as humans, many "legal" things may not be those we want society to uphold. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | TeMPOraL 24 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
It's not really a surprise to many here, but we don't want to go back there too often, because that topic is well trodden - the intellectual property in its current form is far worse offender against "what is moral or just" than anything LLM companies ever did. In fact, the whole problem of shredding books (destructive format-shifting) was created by copyright laws in the first place, and that in itself is a concession hard won against the IP establishment - and all that way before LLMs became a thing. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | phoghed an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Yes IP theft and fair use are discussing legality, not morality. Whether or not it’s moral for someone to make money off somebody else’s labor or Reddit comments, I don’t want to get into a discussion about personally. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||