If you purchased the Mona Lisa (or some rare book), in this hypothetical, you can burn it.

There is a difference between legal and right.

That’s the whole point because the book shredding is already declared legal.

	▲	infinite_spin an hour ago \| parent [-]
		You asked a question about whether you can do something, not whether I found the behavior moral. I'm not interested in moral debates.

▲

Invictus0 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

> For instance, a painter may insist on proper attribution of their painting, and in some instances may sue the owner of the physical painting for destroying the painting even if the owner of the painting lawfully owned it.[1]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Visual_Artists_Rights_Act

	▲	infinite_spin 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		The Mona Lisa's painter isn't alive, they can't sue, and this act doesn't apply to printed books. You're expanding the hypothetical to say "also you're under a specific set of laws that forbid exactly the thing I questioned".. that's moving the goalpost.