Comparing it to fire isn’t really an apt comparison.

You developed the nuclear bomb. Would you give free access to every human on the planet to do with it as they see fit? Or would you demand responsible guardrails from the start?

AI companies want it both ways. This will both redefine humanity as we know it, but also nobody should try to enforce any guardrails. Why? Because it might hurt profits.

Either it’s snake oil and not as revolutionary as claimed, or people should be facing prison time for trying to claim “I just invented it and gave everyone access, I can’t be held responsible for what happens next”.

▲

negamax a day ago | parent | next [-]

Nuclear wasn't governed until the destruction was seen. There's no reason to believe AI wouldn't follow a similar path

▲

tw04 a day ago | parent [-]

The bomb was literally developed under a top secret program, and they didn’t hand out functioning bombs to the general public at any point in time before “the destruction was seen”.

▲

negamax a day ago | parent [-]

It was created at wartime. Not as a civilian project. Developed as a weapon. And other countries were developing nuclear weapons as science of it was never a secret

Destruction display did caused the governments to come together and build frameworks and structures to avoid the repeat of it

	▲	tw04 a day ago \| parent [-]
		Which again, is completely different than giving access to every human being on the planet, then trying to figure out how to regulate it later. Out of the gate access was restricted to government use, and a limited subset of governments at that. There was never a point in time it was handed out to any private citizen to do with as they pleased. As for “we haven’t seen the destruction yet” - huh? Between the proliferation of hacks utilizing AI and drone warfare in ukraine we’ve ABSOLUTELY seen the destruction already.

▲

leoqa a day ago | parent | prev [-]

I mean, does enabling ICE to be more effective actually represent a harm? ICE has authority to do the things it’s doing. The courts are the appropriate venue to check that authority. Two agents murdering citizens is a criminal matter completely unrelated to Google’s relationship with DHS.

It feels like AI empowering scams and facilitating post-truth is more harm.

	▲	superxpro12 18 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		Yes. Much in the same way arming a mass shooter with an M1 Abrams is more destructive than an airsoft gun. Also, ICE is still bound by both the 4th and 5th amendments, of which they have routinely violated. Peretti in particular was executed by an ice agent, and his murderer still runs free.
	▲	gtowey 20 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		> feels like AI empowering scams and facilitating post-truth is more harm. "There are things worse than automating the murder of innocents" is certainly and interesting take.