| ▲ | walrus01 6 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||
Do you mean by trading dollars for the privacy you need as: a) Contracting with a third-party independent inference provider who will run your choice of model on fast hardware that they own, with all appropriate data security/privacy/contractual/compliance protection in place or b) Contracting with the original creators of the model to run inference via their API and with assurances that all the same data protection is in place or c) Spending the money to buy your own inference hardware to run it on something you fully own/control at proper usable speeds? Edit: Everything I've been writing in this thread is mostly within the context of being able to evaluate K3 and its usefulness to be self-hosted as a preliminary proof of concept or test of feasibility of a new thing, such as on <$20,000 of server hardware, before proceeding to spend 300-400k on GPU-related hardware, or external third party services/ongoing billing. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | 30 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
| [deleted] | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | jmalicki 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
A) is very doable with e.g. Amazon Bedrock. They'll give you HIPAA compliance, they even have a data center for US government classified data, they can give you European data sovereignty. And with OpenAI and Anthropic models to boot, you don't even have to settle for open weights. What kind of privacy needs do you really have beyond that? | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||