Not required at an airport, for whatever reason.

The constitution doesn't disappear at the airport. The man is a US citizen. He could have remained silent, and they would eventually have let him in.

	▲	ytoawwhra92 5 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Relevant reading for you: https://www.aclu.org/documents/constitution-100-mile-border-... And no, they wouldn’t have denied him entry, but they would have seized his device.

3form 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I enjoy the funny implication it creates, that then perhaps if you're entering US in 2026 it means there's something wrong with you.

inigyou 11 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

The reason is anti-immigration