This is always been the dumbest thing about "hidden volumes": It relies upon your adversary not knowing about veracrypt's hidden volume. Which BTW, is plainly ADVERTISED on the web site. The second he knows you have veracode, he will ask for the other encrypted volume.

See also relevant XKCD:

https://xkcd.com/538/

▲

red369 12 hours ago | parent [-]

But Veracrypt can be used for encryption of a volume, without creating a hidden volume. I assume it would often be used this way.

The $5 wrench decryption technique would be even more unpleasant if you hadn’t created a hidden volume, as there would be no way to prove you hadn’t.

Should people be sure to never use Veracrypt volume encryption unless they create a hidden volume? I have trouble even thinking this way!

	▲	bb88 10 hours ago \| parent [-]
		The $5 wrench isn't about breaking encryption. It's about breaking will power. If they achieve their goals great for them. If not they proved the second volume either didn't actually exist or your will power was stronger than the $5 wrench. Either way they're probably way more happy with the outcome than you would be. As long as the border your crossing doesn't respect the 4th Amendment, the best approach is to not carry anything incriminating across it, nor anything that may make you suspicious.